<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposal Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com/proposal-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Rozsa</title>
		<link>http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com/proposal-details/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Rozsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com/?page_id=7#comment-11</guid>
		<description>That is a good point, and I was thinking about that one a bit this year.  May be something to consider for sure.  

Thanks for the comment!  
-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good point, and I was thinking about that one a bit this year.  May be something to consider for sure.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!<br />
-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com/proposal-details/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcsfootballplayoffs.com/?page_id=7#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your idea and from and purely from a football fan&#039;s perspective, I think it would be a ton of fun. I think it&#039;s the best solution. 
 
One possible thing to think about for next year would be to take your &quot;No conference teams playing in the first round and take it one step further&quot;. In March Madness, the selection committee won&#039;t put teams from the same conference in the same region until they have to (due to the number of teams). 
 
So, in this years exam[ple, you could have avoided the 2nd round rematch between Florida and LSU by moving the lower seeded LSU team to the Cincinnati region and switch them with Va Tech. If we were going to move LSU 1 seed anyway, might as well move them out of the region all together. 
 
Just a thought. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your idea and from and purely from a football fan&#039;s perspective, I think it would be a ton of fun. I think it&#039;s the best solution. </p>
<p>One possible thing to think about for next year would be to take your &quot;No conference teams playing in the first round and take it one step further&quot;. In March Madness, the selection committee won&#039;t put teams from the same conference in the same region until they have to (due to the number of teams). </p>
<p>So, in this years exam[ple, you could have avoided the 2nd round rematch between Florida and LSU by moving the lower seeded LSU team to the Cincinnati region and switch them with Va Tech. If we were going to move LSU 1 seed anyway, might as well move them out of the region all together. </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
